Tom McFarlin

Software Engineering in WordPress, PHP, and Backend Development

Page 7 of 426

Someone Has Likely Already Written Your Blog Post

This morning, I was going through my RSS reader. In one of the programming feeds that I read, I read two different articles both of which were talking about Git.

Each were talking about something that has been discussed I don’t know how many times over in the past by someone else:

  • Should dependencies be kept in Git or now?
  • And an outline of Git branching strategies.

It’s easy to look at posts like this – just like I can look at stuff I’ve written and realize it’s been discussed by someone else or you can look at stuff that you’ve written and find something similar has been written by someone else – and want to dismiss them.

That’s not the best way to think about publishing practical technical content, though. Even though someone else has likely already written your blog post, that doesn’t mean it isn’t worth writing.

  • You have a different audience than whoever you’ve come across. And although you may be reading something similar to what you’ve read or written, that doesn’t mean that whoever reads your site is reading those sites.
  • Writing for others is important, but it may be just as important if not more important than writing for yourself. Distilling your ideas into something that you can explain is incredibly helpful in making sure you solidify the information you’ve learned.
  • Writing something this year can be different than writing something a few years ago (and will be different in writing it in the future). The economy and environment changes fast.
  • The context in which you’re sharing knowledge and explaining your ideas may be similar, but not exactly the same, as someone else.

The next time you attempt to write about something and are skeptical if you should hit publish or not, go ahead and hit publish. At best, you’re helping yourself and maybe someone else will come across what you’ve shared; at worst, you’re sharing something someone else has shared but it’s unique to what they do.

And since similar isn’t the same as unique, the value of publishing what you have to say is greater than not.

Thanksgiving 2023

For nearly every year I’ve written, I’ve made sure to publish a post on the end-of-the-year holidays here in the United States.

Happy Thanksgiving!
This is the earliest Thanksgiving photo I have in my library.

It’s neat to see what I wrote on this day 10 years ago in comparison to now:

For those of you who are in the United States and are celebrating Thanksgiving, I hope you guys have an awesome day hanging out with your family, friends, eating, sleeping, and generally enjoying the day off.

A lot has changed both personally and professionally since then (though I’m still working in the same industry and enjoying it as much as I always have), but the message is consistent: If you’re in the US, I hope you enjoy the time off; if you’re elsewhere, I hope you enjoy whatever you’re doing today, too.

How To Mitigate Side Effects in WordPress Development

In software development, the concept of a side effect is generally understood to be something like this:

In computer science, an operation, function or expression is said to have a side effect if it modifies some state variable value(s) outside its local environment, which is to say if it has any observable effect other than its primary effect of returning a value to the invoker of the operation.

Side effect, Wikipedia

The Software Engineering Stack Exchange has a great answer. You can read it in its entirety, but I really like how succinct the person puts it:

It’s really very simple. Side effect = changing something somewhere.

There are a handful of ways developers try to mitigate side effects such as automated testing or quality assurance, but when a piece of software is large enough such that each part that composes the system is like a small system unto itself, it’s not difficult to imagine how introducing new code could inadvertently change the state of the program.

This is why any given project at scale is impressive to see work as smoothly as it does. (Sure, projects like large scale web applications, operating systems, are one thing but thinking about medical software, automotive software, the software that runs on airplanes, applications built at places such as NASA, and so on are all the more amazing.)


Bringing this down to the level of stuff I write about and that I work on during my day-to-day – specifically WordPress – side effects are something we’re likely all too familiar with experiencing.

If nothing else, think about the last time you activated a plugin and it immediately conflicted with another plugin or a feature of theme.

  • It could have thrown up a notice,
  • It might have displayed an error message,
  • Perhaps it completely broke the way some part of the way the core application functions,
  • Or it just threw up a PHP error message that wasn’t even clear on what was going on.

To make matters even more fun, the only way to resolve the issue is the disable the plugin via WP CLI or, even more drastic, deleting the plugin.

This is an obvious example of a side effect in WordPress. They can happen for any number reasons, too. Sometimes it’s a matter of running a different version of PHP, it could be a matter of a team not keeping their code contained in its own namespace, or perhaps it’s a matter of not doing enough testing.

Regardless of the case, it’s something many of us have experienced and it’s likely a problem many of us have caused during our careers.

Initially, when I started thinking about side effects in WordPress development, I was working on a plugin that needed to fire when certain events happen during the user management lifecycle.

From there, I started thinking about edge cases and then I started thinking about the overall economy around WordPress and the interoperability and compatibility challenges that come with writing software that runs on top of a piece of open source software that powers so much of the web.

It’s impressive.

Then I was left at a fork of what I wanted to discuss:

  1. Should I talk about the initial problem that kicked off this entire post (that is, making sure I handled all cases of user management)?
  2. Or should I offer general commentary on edge cases and how it relates to work in building WordPress or WordPress adjacent projects?

If you’ve read this far, it’s obvious that I’ve spent more time on the latter than the former. So I’ll save the former for another day.

Since I’ve discussed this at length already, these are a few things – in no specific order – I recommend doing the following things to prevent side effects and conflicts when working on WordPress-specific code:

  • Even if you’re not using object-oriented programming, use namespaces to keep all of your functions contained within their own context.
  • Know the environment(s) in which you’re code is going to run and write for the lowest supported version.
  • When writing a custom function that will fire on a specific hook, take the time to understand the priority and number of arguments the function will expect and write your code defensively (that is, ask “how would I write this code so someone else’s won’t interfere with what I’m trying to do?”)
  • Don’t be afraid of writing unit tests not only to ensure your code is doing what it’s supposed to do but also that it’s not doing anything it shouldn’t be doing.
  • Before writing anything to any type of storage, make sure that the keys you’re using are not already in use and/or make sure to uniquely prefix the keys you’re going to use.
  • Don’t add frontend assets to any page that doesn’t need them.

I don’t know if it’s possible to put together and exhaustive list. But in my experience, these are the things that I’ve found to be helpful especially as it relates to working on backend development.

Asynchronous Methods and Headers: Just Working Isn’t Good Enough

When sending asynchronous requests to a WordPress back-end, which may be a REST API or an Ajax callback, it’s helpful to know what headers to specify when sending said data.

Since I recently shared another post about idempotency in REST API design and since asynchronous calls are more common than they have been in the past, I thought it useful to share when to use what type of headers when making said requests.

If you’re working with WordPress in some capacity – be it a headless state or working on processing Ajax calls – then it’s useful indicate how your data is being sent and in what format the data is being sent. Ultimately, your asynchronous methods and headers need to do more than just work.

That is, it’s not enough for it to simply be sent and received. Instead, the data should be sent in a format congruent with what the backend service expects. If anything, future you will thank you. To make it even more relevant, this is an opportunity to keep our code as clean as possible.


Asynchronous Methods and Headers

When creating an Ajax request in WordPress using modern, vanilla JavaScript the request will likely look something like this:

fetch(tmAcmePlugin.ajaxurl, {
    method: 'POST',
    body: data,
    credentials: 'same-origin',
    headers: new Headers({
        'Content-Type': 'application/json',
    }),
})

Notice here I’m specifying the headers as part of the request which isn’t something we’ve historically done. In this example, I’m using application/json.

It’s also common to send form data across the wire, too. And if you do that, then your request will look something like this:

fetch(tmAcmePlugin.ajaxurl, {
    method: 'POST',
    body: data,
    credentials: 'same-origin',
    headers: new Headers({
        'Content-Type': 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded',
    }),
})

Obviously, know which type of header to send and when is important. As obvious as it seems, these are the guidelines I recommend when working in the context of WordPress-centric applications.

  • Use application/json whenever you’re sending a payload that’s structured as JSON. Whenever you’re receiving the data on the server, you’ll need to use json_decode or your language’s equivalent to parse the data.
  • Use application/x-www-form-urlencoded whenever you’re sending a payload that comes from data being sent from a form element or in a string of key/value pairs such as key_one=value_one&key_two=value_two. Typically, this will be received in a POST request.

Again, however you specify the method and the header, the data will still be sent but how you manage it on the server may not match up to what’s expected.


If someone else – either someone with whom you work or just future you – reads the client-side code and the server-side code and what’s sent doesn’t match, it’s going to create an entire set of circumstances of detangling what’s been done and something that’s completely unavoidable.

Block Notes: Generate a Reference to a Block

I’m working on a block that, like many, isn’t limited to a single instance in the editor (and thus not the frontend); however, because there are certain features of the block I want to manipulate when the page loads, I want generate a reference to said block.

For example, the structure of the markup in the edit function looks something like this:

<div className="wp-acme-block">
  <div className="wp-acme-block-editor">
  </div>
  <div className="wp-acme-block-preview">
  </div>
</div>

The functionality will allow the user to toggle the visibility of the editor container and the preview container. And to manage this functionality, I want to access the parent element of each one. Specifically, the one with the class wp-acme-block.


And this is easy to do with a couple of features of React:

  • useRef is a hook that allows for direct interaction with the DOM. It returns a ref object that maintains a property called current. This enables us to maintain a reference to a specific element.
  • useEffect is a hook that handles side effects in functional components. It allows us to do a lot of things (like fetching data) but also allows us to manually work with the DOM.

Given those two hooks, I can place a ref attribute on the primary container that I can then use elsewhere in the code.

First, in the header of the file add the following:

import { useRef, useEffect } from 'react';

Then at the top of the edit function, I have the following code:

edit: ({ attributes, setAttributes }) => {
    const blockRef = useRef(null);
    // ...
};

Then, in the edit function where I have the markup that I’ve shown above, I’ll add the ref attribute:

<div className="wp-acme-block" ref={blockRef}>
  <div className="wp-acme-block-editor">
  </div>
  <div className="wp-acme-block-preview">
  </div>
</div>

And finally, I can use this reference in the edit function before it calls return so I can refer to the element in other functions.

useEffect(() => {
  acmePreviewFunction(blockRef.current);
}, []);

So the full, relevant code looks like this:

import { useRef, useEffect } from 'react';

// ...

registerBlockType('acme/example-block', {
  // ...

  attributes: {
    // ...
  },
  edit: ({ attributes, setAttributes }) => {
    const blockRef = useRef(null);

    // ...

    useEffect(() => {
      acmePreviewFunction(blockRef.current);
    }, []);

    // ...

    return (
      <div className="wp-acme-block" ref={blockRef}>
        <div className="wp-acme-block-editor">
        </div>
        <div className="wp-acme-block-preview">
        </div>
      </div>
    );
  },
  // ...
});

Then passing the current property as an argument to other functions, you’ve got access to the block such that you can manipulate it with other JavaScript functions.

Further, the ref will refer only to the instance of the block so it won’t manipulate other instances of the block located in the editor (or, more specifically, the DOM).

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 Tom McFarlin

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑