Software Engineering in Web Development, Backend Services, and More

Category: Articles (Page 117 of 258)

Personal opinions and how-to’s that I’ve written both here and as contributions to other blogs.

One Step Towards Dependency Injection in WordPress

Dependency Injection is one of those programmer-y terms that sounds far more complicated than it is.

As defined in Wikipedia:

Dependency injection allows a program design to follow the dependency inversion principle. The client delegates to external code (the injector) the responsibility of providing its dependencies.

The client is not allowed to call the injector code. It is the injecting code that constructs the services and calls the client to inject them. This means the client code does not need to know about the injecting code.

But think about it like this (because if you’ve used object-oriented programming, you’ve no doubt done something like this):

  • You have a class, say Class A that maintains a reference to another class, Class B.
  • In the constructor for Class A, we instantiate Class B and set it equal to a property.

Easy enough, right? Here’s the implication:

Class A now has a dependency on Class B and that dependency is only set during the instantiation process in the constructor of Class A.

On a small scale, this isn’t that big of a deal but as a plugin or an application gets more and more complicated, there are all of these dependencies set in the system without any way to necessarily test them in isolation.

And don’t get me wrong: There should be some cohesion among objects in an application, but the degree to which they are coupled should be small. There are a lot of reasons for this many of which are outside the scope of this post.

To help mitigate this, programmers have created all kinds of strategies to make sure that our classes can be small and focused and tested in isolation all the while working with other parts of the system.

And one of the most popular ways to do this is through dependency injection. But what does dependency injection in WordPress look like (and is it any different than in other applications)?

Continue reading

Understanding WordPress Hooks

WordPress hooks are arguably the foundational topic that developers need to learn and understand when it comes to building more advanced functionality for WordPress.

WordPress Hooks

Yes, you can build an entire theme primarily with markup, styles, and JavaScript. Though you may need a few server-side functions in PHP, it’s easy to find things like this in the WordPress Codex or in Underscores.me.

But if you’re someone who’s new to WordPress or who is ready to take the next step regarding extending the platform or writing a plugin, then it’s important to understand to know what WordPress hooks are, how they work, and what they’re designed to do.

And that’s what I’ve covered in my latest series on Envato.

Continue reading

Your Source Code (“This Could Be Better”)

I’d like to think that one of the struggles many developers feel when shipping code is a sense of “this could be better” before they push whatever button to send their code out into the world.

This Could Be Better: Code Review This

Yeah, okay, code review this.

It doesn’t necessarily matter if this is a hobby project, if this is a project for a corporate job, a freelance job, or if this is something that’s for an open source project. I say that because I think this is something that many of us feel with whatever it is that we release.

It’s a feeling of something is “not quite done” or “if I could just refine this a little bit more.” I know: This isn’t the first time I’ve talked about this before, and it’s likely not going to be the last.

And the feeling is not without merit. Other developers can make us feel like we’re doing something wrong (sometimes we are, sometimes we aren’t). But in our industry, I think there’s more of a spectrum of optimal-to-suboptimal. Though some may not agree, a friend of mine recently said it best:

The software industry is too vast and too fast to keep up with it all. But because it’s now that way, people find their niches and think that it’s the “best” or “only” way to get something done.

The further I get into my career, the more I feel this sense of obligation to make things as pristine as possible before sending it to a client, user, or just out for the world to use.

And though I think this is important, it’s important to make sure that I (and we) are doing this for the right reasons.

An example of a wrong reason might go something like this:

It’s not because it doesn’t meet requirements and it’s not because it doesn’t fulfill what was requested by the client. It’s because how others might perceive the work when they do not have the proper context.

So of course, I don’t think there’s anything wrong with wanting to make your code base or your architecture as robust as possible. We should all strive for that. But I believe that it’s important to contextualize appropriately and adequately scope your sprints, milestones, work or however you group your tasks together.

Continue reading

Finding Optimal Development Tools

I have a tendency to talk about the importance of finding optimal development tools that work best for you, that fit your workflow, and that improve your productivity.

Checking out the i18n Tools

Cornerstone is the Subversion client that I prefer to use.

And I stand by those statements.

But sometimes I wonder if the things that I’ve said don’t come across as mutually exclusive (or even sometimes partially exclusive, if that’s a thing). This is true especially when I talk about things like why I switched from an IDE to a text editor to handle my development tasks.

Anything other than that is never my intent (though I can completely see how someone may interpret my perspective that way).

What I mean is this:

Whenever I share information about what I opt to use, I do so in a way where I mean to give information as to why it works for me.

Admittedly, sometimes I’m better at doing that than others.

Continue reading

How (And Why) to Create a Repository Archive

If you’re someone who regularly develops software, sites, or anything with any code, you’re going to start using source code control at some point.

And when a project ends, you’ve got options when it comes to maintaining the source code:

  • Perhaps you’ll hand the code over to the client, and you will retire it,
  • Or maybe you’ll continue to maintain it for the client as part of an ongoing relationship,
  • Or there’s a chance you’ll be done with the project but still want to hang on to the source code.

For me, I’m partial to the latter option primarily because I like to have an archive of the things I’ve worked on throughout my career (no matter how trivial they may be) and because I’m a bit of a packrat when it comes to things like this.

Because if a client ever comes back for future work on a project, then I want to be able to spin up a copy of the development environment so I can get back to work. This assumes that I have an archive of the source, though.

But this assumes I have a repository archive.

Continue reading

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2026 Tom McFarlin

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑