Author: Tom (Page 289 of 433)

Yesterday, I wrote a post about some of my issues and gripes with dynamically typed languages. Though the post itself didn’t generate a lot of conversation in the comments, I ended up having a good chat via Twitter with a number of developers whom I greatly respect.

In these particular conversations, I was challenged both in terms of how I leverage the dynamic features certain programming languages, as well as how I use certain forms of notation (namely, Hungarian Notation).

I can’t cover everything that I’d like to cover in a single post partially because I’m not certain – at least at this point in time – I’d  change my opinion on everything I wrote.

However, out of the conversations that I did have, I think one point that’s worth clarifying is my opinion on using Hungarian Notation in dynamically typed languages and how the environment can change whether or not I use it.

Continue reading

I remember when I first moved from writing code in statically typed languages such as (C, Java, C#, and so on) to more dynamically typed languages (such as JavaScript, Ruby, and PHP).

At first, I loved it – I loved the brevity that the code allowed, and I loved how being able to write slightly less verbose code felt whenever I was working on part of a program. Being able to drop out certain operators made things so much easier.

Or so I thought.

But the longer I’ve been programming – especially the more time I’ve spent in JavaScript and PHP, for example – the more I find myself returning to more and more verbose code forgoing some of the features that come with dynamically typed languages (such as type coercion).

Continue reading