Like those of you who are reading this, I’m a big fan of reading other people’s blogs for all of the traditional reasons:
- Entertainment
- Learning something new about a topic that I don’t know much about
- Having my opinions or thoughts challenged about something
- …and more
Of course, we all have our preferences for what and who we like to read, but I think that we also have our preferences for the types of topics that we like to read.
Case in point: One of the things that I enjoy reading the most is from people who offer opinions that challenge my own because it gives me food for thought to re-evaluate my own position on any given topic.
Sometime, I end up conceding a point; other times, I end up reaffirming my stance on a position. The thing is, I end up taking a significant amount of time to mull things over, so I rarely end up commenting on the post as soon as I read it.
Then, when I am ready to comment, it’s often too late and the time for the discussion has passed. Sure, sometimes I go back and leave a comment, sometimes I’ll chat with the person on Twitter, and sometimes, I’ll respond in a blog post.
On Referral Fees
A couple of weeks ago, I read an article entitled I Don’t Ask For Referral Fees written by a fellow developer whom I greatly respect.
As I mentioned above, this particular post ended up giving me a lot of food for thought primarily for two reasons:
- I’ve taken referral fees from sharing work with others.
- I’ve given referral fees from receiving work from others.
Obviously, reading another’s opinion that’s in contrast to my own lends itself to my re-evaluating my own position.
To that end, I mentioned to Curtis that I’d like to respond to his post, but do so – respectfully, of couse – on my own site where I’d have more time.
I Don’t Ask For Referral Fees
In his original post, Curtis summarizes his stance in the following:
I never ask for referral fees first because it feels super odd to me. I’ve got work I just can’t do. I’m going to have to say no to it anyway, but because I’m sending it to you I want money.
Wait, read that again. I couldn’t have done the work anyway. Either I was too busy, or it was just not something I could tackle. So I wasn’t going to make money off the project, but now through some magic I feel that I deserve 10% of a contract I can’t do?
That just don’t seem like sound logic to me.
This is the part of the article that stuck with me the longest primarily because there have been times where I have sent other people work and accepted a commission for doing so.
So there’s the rub.
But why?
In complete honesty, it’s because it made me re-evaluate my decisions as to why I have not only given others a commission for passing me work (and felt okay with it), but also why I have requested a commission for passing on work (and felt okay with it).
Simply put, it challenged me to determine the logic behind it.
A good exercise, right?
Accepting Referral Fees
For anyone who’s self-employed and who has had some level of success, you’ve – at some point – felt the weight of having more work than you can do, but not having anyone to do it.
Thus, you end up turning down said work.
Now, I’m assuming that most of these projects are the type that could be done if you opted to cut something else out (say, time with family, friend, exercise, or whatever), but there is a balance that has to be struck so sometimes, the overflow just can’t be done.
This is a tough position to be in because when the overflow gets to a certain point, a company should want to hire someone. There are times where I’ve seriously considered hiring someone.
But here’s the problem: The amount of overflow may be enough to pay someone a decent wage, but if they were to be employed, then there are a number of taxes associated with said employment, and then the wage leftover isn’t necessarily enough to truly pay the person what they are worth.
The thing is, this is a good position to be in, but you have to get to that tipping point where the backlog of work is enough to pay a person what they’re worth.
This is where referral fees come into play.
If you take the employee/employer relationship and reverse it, then you get into the idea of a commission. You’re paying a person for the majority of the work, but your business isn’t necessarily absorbing the overhead that comes with having an employee.
As such, the person to whom the work is contracted receives their due wages, and the person commissioning the work receives payment for the work and giving someone else work (or giving someone else a job).
This Isn’t Political
Finally, don’t read me wrong: I’m not making a political statement.
I’m not saying that companies shouldn’t hire to avoid taxes or anything like that, but there is that point during which a company gets into a position where it needs to hire more people, but can’t quite pay them a decent wage or can’t justify the cost of doing so for that moment in time.
How Do I Take Referral Fees?
So, to that end, there are some projects that I’ve sent to others and haven’t asked for any commission and that’s fine.
For others, there are times where I have taken a commission – sometimes, I’ll manage the project while a contractor will do development; other times, I’ve simply provided someone else with work to do.
At any rate, I’ve never done commission without an expressed agreement between the people with which I work simply because I think that’s what works and what’s honest.
Ultimately, it boils down to the fact that I don’t yet have the ability to justify hiring someone, but I want to be able to provide someone work, and I don’t mind running part of the project in order to justify part of the project.
Again, this was never meant to be a political discussion, but more of one on how the self-employed or small businesses handle this same situation.
With that said, I’m genuinely curious how you guys have handled this same situation if for nothing else to learn how you guys are managing it.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.