One of the things that development teams often talk about is the idea of feedback loops.

Though people may define this a little bit differently depending on their specific circumstance, one way of thinking about them is the amount of time it takes the service provider to request information from the client (or vice versa) and the amount of time as well as the amount of information included in the response.

When it comes to software projects, there are normally two ways in which people consider feedback loops to be valuables:

1. Small feedback loops
2. Large feedback loops

So novel, right?

But here’s the question: What do you do when the person to whom you’re providing a service, or the person to whom you’re working with values the opposite type of feedback loop than you do?

Continue reading

Yesterday, I wrote a post about some of my issues and gripes with dynamically typed languages. Though the post itself didn’t generate a lot of conversation in the comments, I ended up having a good chat via Twitter with a number of developers whom I greatly respect.

In these particular conversations, I was challenged both in terms of how I leverage the dynamic features certain programming languages, as well as how I use certain forms of notation (namely, Hungarian Notation).

I can’t cover everything that I’d like to cover in a single post partially because I’m not certain – at least at this point in time – I’d  change my opinion on everything I wrote.

However, out of the conversations that I did have, I think one point that’s worth clarifying is my opinion on using Hungarian Notation in dynamically typed languages and how the environment can change whether or not I use it.

Continue reading